Visits: 4463
» Ioannes Dantiscus' Correspondence
Copyright © Laboratory for Source Editing and Digital Humanities AL UW

All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording or any other information storage and retrieval system, without prior permission in writing from the publisher.

Letter #1074

Sigismund I Jagiellon to Ioannes DANTISCUS
Vilnius, 1534-01-04
            received [1534]-01-12

Manuscript sources:
1fair copy in Latin, in secretary's hand, AGAD, AZ, 2999, f. 116

Prints:
1AT 16/1 No. 8, p. 17-18 (in extenso; Polish register)

 

Text & apparatus & commentaryPlain textText & commentaryText & apparatus

 

AGAD, AZ, 2999, f. 116r

Sigismund I Jagiellon (Zygmunt I) (*1467 – †1548), King of Poland and Grand Duke of Lithuania (1506-1548); Duke of Głogów (Glogau) (1499-1506), Duke of Opava (1501-1506), Governor of Silesia (1504-1506); son of King Kazimierz IV Jagiellon and Elisabeth of Austria⌊Sigismundus, Dei gratia rex Poland (Kingdom of Poland, Polonia)⌊PoloniaePoland (Kingdom of Poland, Polonia)⌋Sigismund I Jagiellon (Zygmunt I) (*1467 – †1548), King of Poland and Grand Duke of Lithuania (1506-1548); Duke of Głogów (Glogau) (1499-1506), Duke of Opava (1501-1506), Governor of Silesia (1504-1506); son of King Kazimierz IV Jagiellon and Elisabeth of Austria⌋, magnus dux text damaged⌈[dux]dux text damaged⌉ Lithuania⌊Lith text damaged⌈[Lith]Lith text damaged⌉waniaeLithuania⌋, Rus (Russia)⌊RussiaeRus (Russia)⌋ totiusque Royal Prussia (Prussia Regalis), region, part of Prussia annexed to the Kingdom of Poland in 1466 under the provisions of the Second Peace of Thorn⌊PrussiaeRoyal Prussia (Prussia Regalis), region, part of Prussia annexed to the Kingdom of Poland in 1466 under the provisions of the Second Peace of Thorn⌋ et Mazowsze (Masovia) historic region in Central Poland, before 1526 an autonomous duchy and feud of the Kingdom of Poland, from 1526 included in the Kingdom⌊MasoviaeMazowsze (Masovia) historic region in Central Poland, before 1526 an autonomous duchy and feud of the Kingdom of Poland, from 1526 included in the Kingdom⌋ etc. dominus et here text damaged⌈[dominus et here]dominus et here text damaged⌉s

Reverende in Christo Pater, sincere nobis dilecte.

Displiceret nobis text damaged⌈[eret nobis]eret nobis text damaged⌉ [...] text damaged⌈[...][...] text damaged⌉ter, si generosus Stanisław Kostka (*1487 – †1555), as a leader of the so-called nobles' party active in Royal Prussia since 1536, Kostka stood in opposition to most of the members of the Council of Royal Prussia, who wanted to maintain the autonomy of the province and a "balance of power" in terms of governance. The tension between the Prussian Subtreasurer and the Council had been increasing since the Diet in Graudenz (Grudziądz) in 1533. Kostka, connected with the royal court since his youth, was sent to Graudenz as the King's deputy and, contrary to custom, decided to take part in the proceedings. In response to such a step, the Council members stopped the meeting. Kostka accused them of hostility towards the Poles and intervened on this matter at the court. In the absence of the then Bishop of Ermland (Mauritius Ferber) it was Dantiscus who chaired the Graudenz Diet. The incident badly harmed his future relationships with Kostka; 1531-1555 Treasurer of the Prussian lands and Treasurer of Marienburg (Malbork); 1544-1545 Castellan of Elbing (Elbląg), 1545-1546 Castellan of Kulm (Chełmno); 1546-1549 Vice-Voivode of Kulm; 1546-1551 Voivode of Pomerania; 1551-1555 Voivode of Kulm (PSB 14, p. 356; Urzędnicy 5/2, p. 216; MAŁŁEK 1976, p. 119-123)⌊Stanislaus KostkaStanisław Kostka (*1487 – †1555), as a leader of the so-called nobles' party active in Royal Prussia since 1536, Kostka stood in opposition to most of the members of the Council of Royal Prussia, who wanted to maintain the autonomy of the province and a "balance of power" in terms of governance. The tension between the Prussian Subtreasurer and the Council had been increasing since the Diet in Graudenz (Grudziądz) in 1533. Kostka, connected with the royal court since his youth, was sent to Graudenz as the King's deputy and, contrary to custom, decided to take part in the proceedings. In response to such a step, the Council members stopped the meeting. Kostka accused them of hostility towards the Poles and intervened on this matter at the court. In the absence of the then Bishop of Ermland (Mauritius Ferber) it was Dantiscus who chaired the Graudenz Diet. The incident badly harmed his future relationships with Kostka; 1531-1555 Treasurer of the Prussian lands and Treasurer of Marienburg (Malbork); 1544-1545 Castellan of Elbing (Elbląg), 1545-1546 Castellan of Kulm (Chełmno); 1546-1549 Vice-Voivode of Kulm; 1546-1551 Voivode of Pomerania; 1551-1555 Voivode of Kulm (PSB 14, p. 356; Urzędnicy 5/2, p. 216; MAŁŁEK 1976, p. 119-123)⌋ thesaurarius terrarum Prussiae et capitaneus Marien text damaged⌈[arius terrarum Royal Prussia (Prussia Regalis), region, part of Prussia annexed to the Kingdom of Poland in 1466 under the provisions of the Second Peace of Thorn⌊PrussiaeRoyal Prussia (Prussia Regalis), region, part of Prussia annexed to the Kingdom of Poland in 1466 under the provisions of the Second Peace of Thorn⌋ et capitaneus Marien]arius terrarum Prussiae et capitaneus Marien text damaged⌉burgensis, ad eum modum se gereret [...] text damaged⌈[...][...] text damaged⌉ scribit. Verum ille longe secus [...] text damaged⌈[...][...] text damaged⌉ est in Provincial Diet of Royal Prussia ⌊Graudentino conventuProvincial Diet of Royal Prussia ⌋ [...] text damaged⌈[...][...] text damaged⌉ ignominia affectum se questus quidem est [...] text damaged⌈[...][...] text damaged⌉ stare potuisset, nobis ipsum tam hostilem animum [...] text damaged⌈[...][...] text damaged⌉ quemadmodum ipsa scribit. Iniungimus tamen [...] text damaged⌈[...][...] text damaged⌉ nostris, ut omnino vitet controversias cum senatoribus et text damaged⌈[et]et text damaged⌉ praesertim cum S(inceritate) Tua, quod eum facturum non dubitamus, cum quo tamen non negabimus, si opus erit, non solum S(inceritati) Tuae, sed cuilibet postulanti iustitiam facere et eum, si demeruerit, castigare.